Keyword summary
82% 8 analyzed articles/videos 5,192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These State Budget results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.8% saturation with 3,280 hits . Analysis detected 18,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,784 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 43% (21,377 of 37,323 keywords). This State Budget is better (less manipulative) than 57.30% of the peer group. State Budget
Keyword details
Total words: 15,784
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.7% percentile 2.6% BS Score8 analyzed articles15.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.3% 11.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 20.8% 20.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 20.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.0% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst