Keyword summary
66% 31 analyzed articles/videos 19,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These St Louis results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 5,797 hits . Analysis detected 63,016 faulty-reasoning hits from 83,652 analyzed words across 31 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 8% (32,769 of 35,444 keywords). This St Louis is better (less manipulative) than 92.50% of the peer group. St Louis
Keyword details
Total words: 83,652
Article count: 31
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.5% percentile 1.5% BS Score31 analyzed articles83.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst