Keyword summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Seattle Politics results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , In-Group Bias , and Bandwagon , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 39% saturation with 379 hits . Analysis detected 1,542 faulty-reasoning hits from 972 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.3% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,219 of 37,536 keywords). This Seattle Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 94.10% of the peer group. Seattle Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 972
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
94% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 94.1% percentile 9.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles972 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 34.4% 34.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 39.0% 39.0% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 14.8% 14.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 39.0%, sitewide 26.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 34.4%, sitewide 6.7% Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 15.9% In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.8%, sitewide 6.9% Bandwagon: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 11.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst