Keyword summary
14% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,409 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science-Fiction results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 824 hits . Analysis detected 3,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,981 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,588 of 37,533 keywords). This Science-Fiction is better (less manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Science-Fiction
Keyword details
Total words: 4,981
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.8% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.5% 16.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.1% Composition/Division: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst