Keyword summary
35% 4 analyzed articles/videos 8,041 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Science & Technology results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Anecdotal , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 2,098 hits . Analysis detected 18,726 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,432 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (30,959 of 35,861 keywords). This Science & Technology is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group. Science & Technology
Keyword details
Total words: 26,432
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 13.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles26.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst