Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Kreps results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Unattributed Quote , and Overconfidence Bias , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 609 hits . Analysis detected 6,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,236 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 28% (4,774 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Kreps is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group. Sarah Kreps
Author details
Total words: 9,236
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 28.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.1% 1.1% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 5.7% 5.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.6%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst