Author summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Ruby results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Confirmation Bias , with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 16.2% saturation with 257 hits . Analysis detected 1,774 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,590 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 81% (1,254 of 6,524 authors). This Emma Ruby is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group. Emma Ruby
Author details
Total words: 1,590
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
81% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 80.8% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 16.2% 16.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 11.1% 11.1% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 8.1% 8.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 8.7% 8.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 8.4% 8.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 2.3% 2.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 16.2%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.4%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 11.1%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1% Anecdotal: Author 8.7%, sitewide 5.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.6%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 8.1%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Author 6.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Author 2.1%, sitewide 0.4% Middle Ground: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst