Author summary
22% 1 analyzed article/video 2,452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Weinman results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 924 hits . Analysis detected 6,417 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,808 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,385 of 6,628 authors). This Sarah Weinman is better (less manipulative) than 81.20% of the peer group. Sarah Weinman
Author details
Total words: 9,808
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.4% 9.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.4%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst