Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,629 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Romance results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5% saturation with 738 hits . Analysis detected 9,662 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,647 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 9% (30,963 of 34,040 keywords). This Romance is better (less manipulative) than 91.00% of the peer group. Romance
Keyword details
Total words: 14,647
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst