Keyword summary
19% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,888 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Renaissance results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,674 hits . Analysis detected 12,321 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,473 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (31,250 of 37,536 keywords). This Renaissance is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group. Renaissance
Keyword details
Total words: 16,473
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.7% percentile 1.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles16.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst