Keyword summary
12% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,673 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Sox results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias , Halo Effect , and Self-Serving Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 737 hits . Analysis detected 2,992 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,167 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,336 of 34,833 keywords). This Red Sox is better (less manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group. Red Sox
Keyword details
Total words: 5,167
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.4% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst