Author summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video148 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Abraham results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Recency Bias, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 45 hits. Analysis detected 136 faulty-reasoning hits from 592 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (1,267 of 6,433 authors). This Peter Abraham is worse (more manipulative) than 80.30% of the peer group.
Peter Abraham
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠81%Peter Abraham (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 592
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

80% percentile
025507510080.3% percentile
4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles592 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.6%7.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.9%, sitewide 8.1%Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos