Keyword summary
67% 6 analyzed articles/videos 7,371 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Red Scare results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 5,006 hits . Analysis detected 35,046 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,492 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of 44% (20,922 of 36,755 keywords). This Red Scare is better (less manipulative) than 56.90% of the peer group. Red Scare
Keyword details
Total words: 27,492
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.1% percentile 2.6% BS Score6 analyzed articles27.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 18.2% 18.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 2.0% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst