Truthout74%

Miller Labels Leftists a “Cancer” That World Must “Root Out” in Fascistic Speech 97%

By Sharon Zhang79%

7/16/2026, 8:20:31 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Burden of Proof, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 47.6% saturation with 316 hits. Analysis detected 2,182 faulty-reasoning hits from 664 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 93.8% and a BS Rank of 97% (859 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 96.10% of the article peer group.

In a set of fascistic speeches on Thursday, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, White House power broker Stephen Miller, and other top Trump administration officials labelled the political left as a “terrorist” threat and vowed to use all of the tools at their disposal to systematically destroy left-wing groups. 
Representatives from 67 countries gathered in the U.S. on Thursday for a meeting called Rubio on the supposed “Resurgence of Political Terrorism.” 
In addition to Rubio and Miller, several U.S. officials spoke, including figures like Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. 
The remarks from top officials quickly made clear that the meeting’s purpose was to put forth a global offensive against people with left-wing beliefs. 
In his remarks, Miller spoke of the Trump administration’s goals under National Security Presidential Memorandum 7 (NSPM-7) “to disrupt, identify, defund, debank, arrest, and prosecute these political terrorists.” 
“Here in the United States, we have taken the necessary and essential action of formally recognizing left-wing violence as a form of political terrorism that is a direct threat to our national security and survival of our republican form of government,” Miller said. 
He said, without evidence, that there is an epidemic of violence among left-wing groups, and labelled leftists and left-wing organizations as “enemies of civilization” and a “cancer” that can “destroy a society” if not dismantled. 
Miller went even further to say that not only left-wing groups, but also anyone who supports left-wing causes, must be subject to persecution. 
The issue with U.S. institutions, he said, is that they have grown too “soft” in cracking down on left-wing beliefs. 
“Nothing that we do works if the threat of violence and terror goes on unchecked. 
Our political systems don’t work. 
Our judicial systems don’t work. 
Our legal systems don’t work. 
Our jury trials don’t work,” said Miller. 
“At the same time, we have to understand there’s a real threat that those who are not themselves terrorists but who support left-wing violence will create the conditions that allow that violence to go on.” 
He even appears to acknowledge that a threat of widespread left-wing violence isn’t imminent, instead suggesting that the U.S. must work to “prevent a threat from occurring” and called on fellow Americans to work with the administration in targeting the left. 
“It is the burden and the duty of good people of all walks of life to understand that you will always be accused of raising the alarm too loudly,” said Miller, invoking images of a “perfect family  that goes to church every Sunday” being destroyed by the left. 
“If you wait until the point where the worst outcome is so obvious that no one can deny it, you’ve already lost the battle.” 
Miller’s speech echoes some of the worst far right rhetoric against the left from top officials in U.S. history. 
Sen. 
Joseph McCarthy similarly invoked a supposed “all-out battle between communistic atheism and Christianity” in his infamous 1950 speech about supposed “enemies from within” that served as a driving force for the anti-communist movement that followed. 
Miller’s remarks followed similar rhetoric by Rubio, who vowed to “dismantle” supposed left-wing “networks brick by brick.” 
The secretary of state said that such left-wing networks are the “enemies of civilization” and that the left is driven by “hatred.” 
He claims, without evidence, that left-wing “violence” is treated as “sacrosanct” and beyond reproach. 
“This is a distinctive and unique evil. 
It has always been driven by a hatred, above all else, a hatred for civilization itself. 
It is a revolt of the worst against the best,” said Rubio. 
“This is what radical leftism is,” he went on. 
“It may wear various different slogans and ideologies across place and time. 
They can call themselves anti-capitalists or anti-imperialists or communists or anarchist or Marxist. 
But the fundamental character is always the same. 
It’s always the same. 
It is a poisonous resentment cloaked in the language of equality and justice and liberation.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.9%Sharon Zhang: 7.6%Truthout: 5.8%Confirmation Bias20.9%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.2%Truthout: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 4.8%Truthout: 3.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.5%Truthout: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.2%Truthout: 0.4%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.5%Truthout: 1.3%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 2.0%Sharon Zhang: 13.5%Truthout: 10.0%Framing Effect2.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.3%Truthout: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.3%Truthout: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.7%Truthout: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.8%Truthout: 1.0%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 19.1%Sharon Zhang: 2.5%Truthout: 2.3%Pessimism Bias19.1%This article: 47.6%Sharon Zhang: 21.3%Truthout: 12.2%Negativity Bias47.6%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.0%Truthout: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.3%Truthout: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 6.2%Sharon Zhang: 0.1%Truthout: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias6.2%This article: 5.3%Sharon Zhang: 2.4%Truthout: 1.9%In-Group Bias5.3%This article: 3.2%Sharon Zhang: 2.3%Truthout: 0.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.2%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.6%Truthout: 1.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.0%Truthout: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.7%Truthout: 1.2%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Sharon Zhang: 0.6%Truthout: 0.3%Primacy Effect2.9%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.2%Truthout: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.5%Truthout: 1.6%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.0%Truthout: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 7.4%Sharon Zhang: 5.3%Truthout: 3.7%Appeal to Authority7.4%This article: 7.1%Sharon Zhang: 1.5%Truthout: 1.9%False Dilemma7.1%This article: 2.3%Sharon Zhang: 1.8%Truthout: 1.5%Slippery Slope2.3%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.2%Truthout: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 16.4%Sharon Zhang: 10.1%Truthout: 7.7%Hasty Generalization16.4%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.9%Truthout: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.4%Truthout: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 46.4%Sharon Zhang: 11.4%Truthout: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion46.4%This article: 2.4%Sharon Zhang: 1.7%Truthout: 1.7%Begging the Question2.4%This article: 5.3%Sharon Zhang: 2.9%Truthout: 3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.3%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.1%Truthout: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 36.7%Sharon Zhang: 2.0%Truthout: 0.8%Burden of Proof36.7%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.0%Truthout: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 2.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.3%Truthout: 0.4%Composition/Division2.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 1.2%Truthout: 2.7%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.1%Truthout: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 25.5%Sharon Zhang: 3.2%Truthout: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)25.5%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.0%Truthout: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.8%Sharon Zhang: 0.4%Truthout: 0.1%Middle Ground1.8%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.4%Truthout: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 0.3%Truthout: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 18.1%Sharon Zhang: 1.2%Truthout: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy18.1%This article: 6.5%Sharon Zhang: 3.0%Truthout: 1.5%Unattributed Quote6.5%This article: 9.3%Sharon Zhang: 2.2%Truthout: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection9.3%This article: 22.0%Sharon Zhang: 15.2%Truthout: 9.5%Biased Writer Voice22.0%This article: 5.3%Sharon Zhang: 1.9%Truthout: 2.9%Indoctrination5.3%This article: 2.0%Sharon Zhang: 8.6%Truthout: 7.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.0%This article: 5.3%Sharon Zhang: 0.7%Truthout: 0.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias5.3%This article: 0.0%Sharon Zhang: 2.6%Truthout: 1.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

664 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers64%attributed speech238writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageStephen Miller • 28 words • 100.0% coverageStephen Miller • 43 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Miller • 35 words • 100.0% coverageStephen Miller • 23 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Miller • 20 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Miller • 15 words • 100.0% coverageStephen Miller • 5 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Miller • 5 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Miller • 5 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Miller • 7 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Miller • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageStephen Miller • 49 words • 0.0% coverageStephen Miller • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 22 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 14 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 9 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMarco Rubio • 15 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Stephen Miller

100%flagged-word coverage
294 attributed words69% of attributed speech92% writer coverage
0%32.5%65.0%Biased Writer Voice-61.3 ptsWriter: 61.3%Stephen Miller: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-26.1 ptsWriter: 26.1%Stephen Miller: 0.0%0.0%Politically Right Leaning -14.7 ptsWriter: 14.7%Stephen Miller: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+14.6 ptsWriter: 0.0%Stephen Miller: 14.6%14.6%Indoctrination+11.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Stephen Miller: 11.9%11.9%Politically Left Leaning B-5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Stephen Miller: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.