Topic summary
⁠95%4 analyzed articles/videos864 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fascism results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 27.8% saturation with 4,473 hits. Analysis detected 27,983 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,098 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,126 of 15,364 topics). This Fascism is worse (more manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Fascism
Topic details
Total words: 16,098
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.1% percentile
3.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles16.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 27.8%27.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 11.3%11.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.8%12.8%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 7.8%7.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.5%8.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 27.8%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.5%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Straw Man: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos