Keyword summary
46% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reconciliation results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 3,395 hits . Analysis detected 19,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,584 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (29,861 of 37,536 keywords). This Reconciliation is better (less manipulative) than 79.60% of the peer group. Reconciliation
Keyword details
Total words: 21,584
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.3% 7.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst