Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara Sprunt results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 857 hits . Analysis detected 5,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,702 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,823 of 6,629 authors). This Barbara Sprunt is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group. Barbara Sprunt
Author details
Total words: 4,702
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.4% percentile 2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.7% 4.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.2% 18.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.0% 12.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.9% 1.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2% Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst