Author summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,231 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Barbara Sprunt results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 857 hits. Analysis detected 5,298 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,702 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 58% (2,823 of 6,629 authors). This Barbara Sprunt is worse (more manipulative) than 57.40% of the peer group.
Barbara Sprunt
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
58%Barbara Sprunt (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 4,702
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

57% percentile
025507510057.4% percentile
2.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.2%18.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.9%3.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 4.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos