Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 5,237 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raul Castro results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 2,340 hits . Analysis detected 15,834 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,101 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,158 of 37,536 keywords). This Raul Castro is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group. Raul Castro
Keyword details
Total words: 21,101
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles21.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst