Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos1,794 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prince William results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 1,241 hits. Analysis detected 12,407 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,823 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (15,794 of 35,014 keywords). This Prince William is worse (more manipulative) than 54.90% of the peer group.
Prince William
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠0%Anthony Romano1%
⁠55%Prince William (selected)4%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

55% percentile
025507510054.9% percentile
3.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.6%12.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 11.2%11.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.2%12.2%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 7.3%7.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 6.7%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.2%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos