Keyword summary
14%2 analyzed articles/videos2,203 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Prenuptial Agreement results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Representativeness Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.1% saturation with 783 hits. Analysis detected 4,744 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,704 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 14% (32,395 of 37,536 keywords). This Prenuptial Agreement is better (less manipulative) than 86.30% of the peer group.
Prenuptial Agreement
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
14%Prenuptial Agreement (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,704
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

14% percentile
025507510013.7% percentile
1.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos