Keyword summary
60% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Power Plants results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , False Dilemma , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,494 hits . Analysis detected 12,461 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,622 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (18,880 of 36,701 keywords). This Power Plants is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Power Plants
Keyword details
Total words: 11,622
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 10.4% 10.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 12.4% 12.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst