Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 1,979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pope Leo results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 777 hits . Analysis detected 7,885 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,080 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (13,968 of 36,204 keywords). This Pope Leo is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group. Pope Leo
Keyword details
Total words: 6,080
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.4% percentile 3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst