Keyword summary
75%2 analyzed articles/videos4,064 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pepfar results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 2,196 hits. Analysis detected 13,858 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,322 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,014 of 37,536 keywords). This Pepfar is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Pepfar
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
28%Pepfar (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 14,322
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.1%6.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.3%15.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos