Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos84 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peace Negotiations Process results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 307 hits. Analysis detected 1,638 faulty-reasoning hits from 940 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 10.3% and a BS Rank of 95% (1,849 of 36,408 keywords). This Peace Negotiations Process is worse (more manipulative) than 94.90% of the peer group.
Peace Negotiations Process
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
95%Peace Negotiations Process (selected)11%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

95% percentile
025507510094.9% percentile
10.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles940 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 15.8%15.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 18.2%18.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 14.9%14.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 27.1%27.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 8.9%8.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 32.7%32.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 32.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 27.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 4.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate