Keyword summary
17% 5 analyzed articles/videos 5,191 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Parliament results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.7% saturation with 1,418 hits . Analysis detected 12,128 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,311 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 7% (34,419 of 36,866 keywords). This Parliament is better (less manipulative) than 93.40% of the peer group. Parliament
Keyword details
Total words: 18,311
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
7% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 6.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst