Keyword summary
93% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,714 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pancreatic Cancer results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 2,273 hits . Analysis detected 13,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,494 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,341 of 37,536 keywords). This Pancreatic Cancer is better (less manipulative) than 51.50% of the peer group. Pancreatic Cancer
Keyword details
Total words: 12,494
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.5% percentile 2.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 18.2% 18.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 18.2%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst