Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video 779 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Henry I. Miller results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 465 hits . Analysis detected 2,501 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,116 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of â 62% (2,554 of 6,628 authors). This Henry I. Miller is worse (more manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group. Henry I. Miller
Author details
Total words: 3,116
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
62% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 61.5% percentile 3.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.0% 4.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 14.9% 14.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.6% 9.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.9% 5.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.4%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Composition/Division: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% False Dilemma: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Nature: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst