Keyword summary
61% 7 analyzed articles/videos 2,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Tankers results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,721 hits . Analysis detected 11,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,410 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (22,476 of 34,525 keywords). This Oil Tankers is better (less manipulative) than 65.10% of the peer group. Oil Tankers
Keyword details
Total words: 11,410
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.9% percentile 2.3% BS Score7 analyzed articles11.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 15.1% 15.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst