Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 800 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Tanker results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 51.8% saturation with 1,469 hits . Analysis detected 7,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,836 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 7% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,860 of 37,536 keywords). This Oil Tanker is worse (more manipulative) than 89.70% of the peer group. Oil Tanker
Keyword details
Total words: 2,836
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
90% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 89.7% percentile 7.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 51.8% 51.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 22.6% 22.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 15.4% 15.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 28.4% 28.4% Genetic Fallacy Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 8.3% 8.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Framing Effect: Keyword 51.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 28.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 18.1%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 3.1% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 9.1% Begging the Question: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 1.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 4.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst