Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,200 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Og Anunoby results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 24.4% saturation with 2,925 hits . Analysis detected 15,695 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,975 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (15,430 of 34,832 keywords). This Og Anunoby is worse (more manipulative) than 55.70% of the peer group. Og Anunoby
Keyword details
Total words: 11,975
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.7% percentile 3.1% BS Score5 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.0% 5.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 24.4% 24.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 8.4% 8.4% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 24.4%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 9.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 2.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst