Keyword summary
74% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,644 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Obama Presidential Center results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 3,129 hits . Analysis detected 27,319 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,222 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (27,167 of 37,536 keywords). This Obama Presidential Center is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Obama Presidential Center
Keyword details
Total words: 27,222
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.6% percentile 2.1% BS Score7 analyzed articles27.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst