Keyword summary
37% 14 analyzed articles/videos 11,611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nuclear Deal results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 4,205 hits . Analysis detected 33,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,578 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (32,542 of 36,912 keywords). This Nuclear Deal is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Nuclear Deal
Keyword details
Total words: 41,578
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 1.6% BS Score14 analyzed articles41.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst