Keyword summary
⁠28%5 analyzed articles/videos7,140 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natural History results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 2,876 hits. Analysis detected 20,010 faulty-reasoning hits from 24,401 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (29,674 of 37,536 keywords). This Natural History is better (less manipulative) than 79.10% of the peer group.
Natural History
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠21%Natural History (selected)2%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

21% percentile
025507510020.9% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles24.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.8%11.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 9.5%9.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.5%3.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos