Keyword summary
7% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,447 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Money In Politics results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 1,946 hits . Analysis detected 11,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,044 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (36,446 of 37,536 keywords). This Money In Politics is better (less manipulative) than 97.10% of the peer group. Money In Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 22,044
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
3% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.9% percentile 1.2% BS Score5 analyzed articles22K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.4% 5.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst