Author summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These David Lingelbach results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 4.4% saturation with 408 hits . Analysis detected 1,357 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,170 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 6,359 authors). This David Lingelbach is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. David Lingelbach
Author details
Total words: 9,170
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.1% 0.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.0% 0.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.1%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Straw Man: Author 0.1%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst