Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 382 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mole results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 53.1% saturation with 812 hits . Analysis detected 2,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,528 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.1% and a BS Rank of 87% (5,039 of 37,343 keywords). This Mole is worse (more manipulative) than 86.50% of the peer group. Mole
Keyword details
Total words: 1,528
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.5% percentile 6.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 53.1% 53.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 26.8% 26.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 13.6% 13.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 5.6% 5.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.8% 12.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 53.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 26.8%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 6.7% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.8% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 4.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 0.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Composition/Division: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst