Keyword summary
96% 9 analyzed articles/videos 4,232 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mike Vrabel results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 24.6% saturation with 3,021 hits . Analysis detected 18,919 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,276 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,884 of 37,536 keywords). This Mike Vrabel is worse (more manipulative) than 60.30% of the peer group. Mike Vrabel
Keyword details
Total words: 12,276
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.3% percentile 3.4% BS Score8 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.6% 23.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.9% 7.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 24.6% 24.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 24.6%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.6%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst