Fox News89%

Don't @ Me with Dan Dakich 78%

4/27/2026, 12:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Recency Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 176 hits. Analysis detected 1,088 faulty-reasoning hits from 498 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 69.6% and a BS Rank of 78% (4,853 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 77.80% of the article peer group.

This page is a category listing for the Fox News show 'Don't @ Me with Dan Dakich', featuring recent episodes and articles. 
It includes summaries of the latest content: 
Former NFL sideline reporter Michele Tafoya weighs in on why Russini's credibility is forever gone. 
Michele Tafoya calls the Dianna Russini-Mike Vrabel controversy a credibility and ethics problem, not a sweeping indictment of women in NFL media. 
Will anyone hire Dianna Russini ever again? 
Dianna Russini's career as a national NFL insider is reportedly over amid the ongoing scandal involving Patriots coach Mike Vrabel allegations. 
Inside the Warriors’ Growing Frustration With Steve Kerr | Don't @ Me w/ Dan Dakich. 
The noise around Steve Kerr is getting louder—and now it’s coming from inside the Warriors. 
A new report claims frustration is building within Golden State over Kerr’s increasingly outspoken political activism. 
Michele Tafoya Reacts To The Latest Trump Assassination Attempt | Don't @ Me w/Dan Dakich. 
Michele Tafoya reacts to the latest assassination attempt on Donald Trump's life. 
She reflects on the Minnesota politician who was killed in their home & calls the current scene of the political landscape as scary. 
Bryant Haines Is The Latest Tough Coach At Indiana | Don't @ Me w/Dan Dakich. 
Dan stands behind Indiana DC Bryant Haines after he tweeted out his hardest offenses to play against from last season, omitting Alabama, but including Paul Finebaum. 
Dan gives high praise to Haines for being the latest in a long line of tough Indiana coaches. 
The Little 500 was a mess this year | Don't @ Me w/Dan Dakich. 
The "Little 500" bike race was a mess this year in Indiana with people ending up getting shot. 
Dan gives his perspective on what went wrong & details the history of the event. 
Michele Tafoya Thinks Mike Tomlin Will Be A Star On NBC | Don't @ Me w/Dan Dakich. 
After spending many years with NBC, Michele Tafoya believes Mike Tomlin will be a star for the network this year after he got out of coaching. 
She believes Tomlin is one of the best people around the game of football & will be great on TV. 
Dianna Russini Crossed Journalistic Lines Of Ethics With Vrabel | Don't @ Me w/Dan Dakich. 
Dan asks Michele Tafoya for her perspective on the Dianna Russini-Mike Vrabel situation. 
Michele thinks that Russini definitely crossed a line for journalistic integrity & hopes she doesn't set back other women in sports. 
Mike Vrabel & Dianna Russini's Cheating Scandal Just EXPLODED As More Evidence Comes Out. 
Dakich breaks down the viral Mike Vrabel and Dianna Russini photos and investigates whether the fallout led to the Patriots' recent statement on mandated counseling. 
Have Some Balls And Break Off The Marriage. 
Dan Dakich reacts to the latest in the Dianna Russini-Mike Vrabel saga stating that he's officially fed up with the two. 
They both should either not cheat or have the courage to break off their respective marriages. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 10.4%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.2%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic9.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.6%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 7.4%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias7.4%This article: 14.5%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias14.5%This article: 35.3%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias35.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 7.6%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect7.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 18.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias18.5%This article: 3.6%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect3.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 8.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority8.4%This article: 3.2%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma3.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization8.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.3%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion13.3%This article: 3.0%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question3.0%This article: 9.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 3.6%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division3.6%This article: 5.0%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal5.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.4%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote8.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 22.7%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice22.7%This article: 9.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination9.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

498 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers52%attributed speech241writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Tafoya • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Tafoya • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Tafoya • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Tafoya • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageDan Dakich • 26 words • 100.0% coverageDan Dakich • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageDan Dakich • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Tafoya • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Tafoya • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageDan Dakich • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMichele Tafoya • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageDan Dakich • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageDan Dakich • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dan Dakich

76%flagged-word coverage
118 attributed words46% of attributed speech85% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-46.9 ptsWriter: 46.9%Dan Dakich: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+15.4 ptsWriter: 6.6%Dan Dakich: 22.0%22.0%Indoctrination-10.0 ptsWriter: 10.0%Dan Dakich: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.