Keyword summary
97%7 analyzed articles/videos3,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dianna Russini results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.1% saturation with 2,281 hits. Analysis detected 13,847 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,092 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 61% (14,641 of 37,536 keywords). This Dianna Russini is worse (more manipulative) than 61.00% of the peer group.
Dianna Russini
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
61%Dianna Russini (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.0% percentile
3.4% BS Score6 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 16.1%16.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 25.1%25.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 5.7%5.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 25.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.4%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate