Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 498 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Activism In Sports results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Halo Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 32.7% saturation with 651 hits . Analysis detected 2,655 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 73% (4,476 of 16,562 topics). This Political Activism In Sports is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group. Political Activism In Sports
Topic details
Total words: 1,992
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 73.0% percentile 4.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 32.7% 32.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.2% 11.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 32.7%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Indoctrination: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst