Speaker summary
⁠72%1 analyzed article/video326.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dan Dakich results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 30% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 763.065 faulty-reasoning hits from 326.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 11.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠15% (24,274 of 28,364 speakers). This Dan Dakich is better (less manipulative) than 85.60% of the peer group.
Dan Dakich
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 326.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

14% percentile
025507510014.4% percentile
11.3% BS Score1 analyzed videos326.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 27.1%27.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 8.5%8.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 16.6%16.6%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Speaker 16.0%16.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 30.0%30.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 11.6%11.6%Genetic FallacySitewide 1.4%Speaker 9.0%9.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 8.9%8.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 10.4%10.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 30.0%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 27.1%, sitewide 8.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Speaker 16.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 16.0%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 4.6%In-Group Bias: Speaker 9.8%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.7%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 9.1%Genetic Fallacy: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 9.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Speaker 8.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 1.7%Straw Man: Speaker 5.7%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos