Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos889 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nfl Scandals results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 1,091 hits. Analysis detected 4,805 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,165 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠73% (4,472 of 16,562 topics). This Nfl Scandals is worse (more manipulative) than 73.00% of the peer group.
Nfl Scandals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,165
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

73% percentile
025507510073.0% percentile
4.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 34.5%34.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.6%12.6%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 7.6%7.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 12.4%12.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.4%3.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.8%5.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 34.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 1.9%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos