Keyword summary
36% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,862 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Wu results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Biased Writer Voice , and Halo Effect , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10% saturation with 994 hits . Analysis detected 9,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,972 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (26,047 of 35,718 keywords). This Michelle Wu is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Michelle Wu
Keyword details
Total words: 9,972
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles10K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst