Keyword summary
42% 11 analyzed articles/videos 3,472 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Damon results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Halo Effect , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.9% saturation with 5,907 hits . Analysis detected 36,968 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,672 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (29,421 of 35,444 keywords). This Matt Damon is better (less manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Matt Damon
Keyword details
Total words: 39,672
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 17.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles39.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.9% 14.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst