Keyword summary
66% 4 analyzed articles/videos 5,014 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Margaret Thatcher results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 2,991 hits . Analysis detected 21,828 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,340 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 35% (24,620 of 37,536 keywords). This Margaret Thatcher is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Margaret Thatcher
Keyword details
Total words: 18,340
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.4% percentile 2.3% BS Score4 analyzed articles18.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 16.3% 16.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 16.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst