Author summary
95% 2 analyzed articles/videos 982 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Noel S. Williams results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Ad Hominem , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 37.4% saturation with 1,255 hits . Analysis detected 8,616 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,353 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of 87% (827 of 6,170 authors). This Noel S. Williams is worse (more manipulative) than 86.60% of the peer group. Noel S. Williams
Author details
Total words: 3,353
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 86.6% percentile 5.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 37.4% 37.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 35.0% 35.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 27.1% 27.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 19.9% 19.9% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 16.3% 16.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 13.3% 13.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 9.3% 9.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 37.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 35.0%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 27.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 22.9%, sitewide 19.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 19.9%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 16.3%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Author 9.3%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 6.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Horn Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 1.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.7% Straw Man: Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst