American Thinker94%
These women should neither be seen nor heard 93%
By Noel S. Williams95%
7/22/2026, 4:00:00 AM
BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 83% saturation with 477 hits. Analysis detected 2,245 faulty-reasoning hits from 575 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.8% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,636 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.50% of the article peer group.
Little women with screechy voices and purple hair should be seen but not heard.
Actually, they shouldn't be seen, either.
Given their determination to be repulsive, lets give them what they deserve by turning a blind eye.
What is it with crazed women who, knowing that they'll be mollycoddled, audaciously interfere in various public proceedings?
The only solace a normal person can take is that they must be very unhappy to engage in such antisocial antics.
They are not friends to themselves, let alone others.
(Dems don't make good friends.)
Have you noticed how, during daylight protesting hours, when some semblance of police-enforced order prevails, they screech obscenities from the front lines of their protest du jour ?
When the sun sets and tensions escalate, they are less daring as they scurry off to their little hideouts, turning the chaotic protest over to anarchist thugs.
Yesterday, the professional female protesters weren't assembling in some staging area outside an ICE facility, but where they knew they'd be protected: in the once hallowed halls of Congress.
Once.
Secretary of War Pete Hegseth testified before Congress, essentially requesting more funds to further our A.I. and compute capacities, pay our servicemen, and replenish munitions.
He could barely finish a sentence before some ghastly old cow from the peanut gallery decided to interject some ill considered "free speech."
This happened repeatedly.
None of the interlopers was brave - just loud-mouthed idiots with no capacity for understanding policy intricacies or nuance.
These were mostly women with awful, grating voices.
They knew they'd be escorted out of the hearing room with kid gloves, then complimented by the legacy media, probably earning a pay raise from their billionaire benefactors, to boot.
Really, they are acting like spoiled little girls who don't get their way.
Back in the day, this phrase circulated in polite company: "Children should be seen but not heard."
Actually, that sentiment has never been more appropriate.
Other than faux feminists who insist on empowering useless women who act like girls, who else would really benefit from what a gender studies graduate has to say?
Many college degrees are useless nowadays, especially the non-STEM ones that these verbose women often pursue.
They pretend to be independent, but with obsolete skills , they are totally dependent.
That is one reason why they gravitate toward the Dems.
Obviously, free speech has limits.
Not only is one forbidden from shouting "fire!"
in a crowded theater (if there is none), or inciting violence, but decorum must be maintained in congressional hearings, at least among onlookers.
(If congressmen and those testifying want to go at it, then go for it.)
But why gently escort these bile-spewing, misbehaved girls (who probably don't contribute much to society) the pleasant way out the door?
Their petulance is undignified, so spray them (accurately, so as not to get bystanders), cuff them, net them, then drag them out ignominiously.
This is America, and due process will prevail, but once treated commensurate with her childish impudence, I bet the next screaming woman will have second thoughts before interrupting her superiors.
Then the likes of Secretary Hegseth can proceed with convincing our lawmakers of our nation's vital interests.
Leftist lunatics can watch CNN or MSNBC.
Now to see those wailing women go berserk when facts elude them.
Some may find that shockingly entertaining; for the rest of us, they should be neither seen nor heard.
Speakers
1speaker4.3%attributed speech550writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Selected voice
100%flagged-word coveragePete Hegseth
25 attributed words100% of attributed speech99% writer coverage
Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Analysis
Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.