Keyword summary
99%1 analyzed article/video575 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Feminists results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Biased Writer Voice, and Negativity Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 45.6% saturation with 787 hits. Analysis detected 5,160 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,725 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 95% (2,077 of 37,536 keywords). This Feminists is worse (more manipulative) than 94.50% of the peer group.
Feminists
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
95%Feminists (selected)10%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,725
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

95% percentile
025507510094.5% percentile
9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 41.0%41.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 45.6%45.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 35.1%35.1%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 21.4%21.4%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 18.6%18.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 14.3%14.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 30.3%30.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 9.4%9.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 45.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 41.0%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 35.1%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 30.3%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 21.4%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 18.6%, sitewide 3.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 15.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.4%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Horn Effect: Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 1.0%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7%Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 0.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos