Keyword summary
91% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,746 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mandela Barnes results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 1,606 hits . Analysis detected 14,445 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,206 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,284 of 37,536 keywords). This Mandela Barnes is worse (more manipulative) than 51.30% of the peer group. Mandela Barnes
Keyword details
Total words: 11,206
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.3% percentile 2.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.4% 9.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.5% 12.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 4.6% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst