Keyword summary
86% 33 analyzed articles/videos 17,463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Labour Party results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 29.8% saturation with 28,489 hits . Analysis detected 163,789 faulty-reasoning hits from 95,449 analyzed words across 33 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 57% (15,858 of 36,899 keywords). This Labour Party is worse (more manipulative) than 57.00% of the peer group. Labour Party
Keyword details
Total words: 95,449
Article count: 33
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
57% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 57.0% percentile 3.2% BS Score33 analyzed articles95.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 29.9% 29.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.5% 9.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 14.4% 14.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 29.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.4%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 2.2% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Straw Man: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst